Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHodne, Lasse
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-29T14:25:07Z
dc.date.available2019-10-29T14:25:07Z
dc.date.created2013-12-13T16:35:02Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationKunst og kultur. 2013, (3/96), 134-143.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0023-5415
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2625204
dc.description.abstractInitially, Italian fascism embraced the development of modernism, but subsequently made a turn towards ancient Roman architecture models around 1934. What was the reason for this change, and what was fascism looking for in earlier periods? Focus on the center, malong with its reaction against modernism, aligns perfectly with the ideas of the conservative art historian Hans Sedlmayr, wherefore this paper argues that symmetry and central axis was emphasized over columns, arches, and ornaments. According to Sedlmayr, the center (Mitte) – the point where the divine becomes manifest – is precisely what modern art lacks. In response to the Modernist ‘absence’, fascist cultural politics attempted to install an ‘aesthetics of presence’.nb_NO
dc.language.isonobnb_NO
dc.publisherUniversitetsforlagetnb_NO
dc.titleSkinn av nærværnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber134-143nb_NO
dc.source.journalKunst og kulturnb_NO
dc.source.issue3/96nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1076711
dc.description.localcodeThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions (c) 2013 by Universitetsforlagetnb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,62,35,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for kunst- og medievitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel