Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFeren, Anne
dc.contributor.authorTorheim, Liv Elin
dc.contributor.authorLillegaard, Inger Therese L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-09T12:37:18Z
dc.date.available2019-10-09T12:37:18Z
dc.date.created2011-12-16T09:55:48Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationFood & Nutrition Research. 2011, 55 .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1654-6628
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2621195
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire for assessing nutritional knowledge among overweight adults. The questionnaire should reveal knowledge about current dietary recommendations, sources of nutrients, everyday food choices, and conditions related to overweight. Design: The first draft of the nutrition knowledge questionnaire (113 items) was based on literature review. To ensure content validity and expert-assessed face validity, an expert panel examined the questionnaire. Thereafter, the questionnaire was tested for user friendliness and ambiguity by five students. The questionnaire was pilot tested in a group of obese adults, similar to the target group. The results were analyzed for item difficulty and internal consistency and comments made by respondents were taken into account. Two student groups, differing in nutritional expertise, answered the questionnaire on two occasions to test construct validity and test-retest reliability. After the retest, a total overview of the questionnaire was made by the expert panel. The final questionnaire consisted of 91 items. Subjects: The pilot study was conducted in obese adults waiting for a gastric bypass operation (n=33). Construct validity (n=34) and test-retest reliability (n=27) was tested in two student groups: public health nutrition students and construction students. Results: Results from the pilot study showed that internal consistency of the three first sections together was 0.84, measured by Cronbach’s ?. Test of construct validity showed that public health nutrition students scored significantly better than construction students (p<0.001 for all sections), and test-retest reliability for all sections together was 0.82 (Pearson’s r). Conclusion: The knowledge questionnaire had reasonable content-, face-, and construct validities and overall good reliability. The questionnaire can be a useful tool for measuring nutrition knowledge among obese adults.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttp://www.foodandnutritionresearch.net/index.php/fnr/article/view/7271/12468
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDevelopment of a nutrition knowledge questionnaire for obese adultsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber7nb_NO
dc.source.volume55nb_NO
dc.source.journalFood & Nutrition Researchnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3402/fnr.v55i0.7271
dc.identifier.cristin869007
dc.description.localcodeThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to SNF Swedish Nutrition Foundation.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,66,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for bioteknologi og matvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal