Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCloete, Schalk Willem Petrus
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Mohammed Nazeer Ul Hasan
dc.contributor.authorAmini, Shahriar
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-24T11:17:53Z
dc.date.available2019-09-24T11:17:53Z
dc.date.created2019-04-10T20:19:46Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019, 44 (7), 3492-3510.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0360-3199
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2618472
dc.description.abstractA recent techno-economic study (Spallina et al., Energy Conversion and Management 120: p. 257–273) showed that the membrane assisted chemical looping reforming (MA-CLR) technology can produce H2 with integrated CO2 capture at costs below that of conventional steam methane reforming. A key technical challenge related to MA-CLR is the achievement of reliable solids circulation between the air and fuel reactors at large scale under the high (>50 bar) operating pressures required for optimal performance. This work therefore presents process modelling and economic assessments of a simplified alternative; membrane assisted autothermal reforming (MA-ATR), that inherently avoids this technical challenge. The novelty of MA-ATR lies in replacing the MA-CLR air reactor with an air separation unit (ASU), thus avoiding the need for oxygen carrier circulation. The economic assessment found that H2 production from MA-ATR is only 1.5% more expensive than MA-CLR in the base case. The calculated cost of hydrogen (compressed to 150 bar) in the base case was 1.55 €/kg with a natural gas price of €6/GJ and an electricity price of €60/MWh. Both concepts show continued performance improvements with an increase in reactor pressure and temperature, while an optimum cost is achieved at about 2 bar H2 permeate pressure. Sensitivities to other variables such as financing costs, membrane costs, fuel and electricity prices are similar between MA-ATR and MA-CLR. Natural gas prices represent the most important sensitivity, while the sensitivity to membrane costs is relatively small at high reactor pressures. MA-ATR therefore appears to be a promising alternative to achieve competitive H2 production with CO2 capture if technical challenges significantly delay scale-up and deployment of MA-CLR technology. The key technical demonstration required before further MA-ATR scale-up is membrane longevity under the high reactor pressures and temperatures required to minimize the cost of hydrogen.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEconomic assessment of membrane-assisted autothermal reforming for cost effective hydrogen production with CO 2 capturenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber3492-3510nb_NO
dc.source.volume44nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational journal of hydrogen energynb_NO
dc.source.issue7nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.110
dc.identifier.cristin1691470
dc.description.localcode© 2019. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 9.1.2021 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for energi- og prosessteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal