Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLyu, Chuangxin
dc.contributor.authorGhoreishian Amiri, Seyed Ali
dc.contributor.authorGao, Hao
dc.contributor.authorIngeman-Nielsen, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGrimstad, Gustav
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-05T11:54:44Z
dc.date.available2019-09-05T11:54:44Z
dc.date.created2019-09-04T07:28:47Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.isbn9780784482599
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2612669
dc.description.abstractThe previous laboratory study of joint electrical resistivity and acoustic velocity measurements is reviewed for both consolidated and unconsolidated permafrost in this paper. The relation of logarithm of resistivity log(R) and P-wave velocity Vp is a concave function. An increase of temperature, fine content, and salinity results in a decrease of both acoustic velocity and electrical resistivity. Electrical resistivity is sensitive to salinity, while acoustic velocity changes substantially near thawing temperature. The joint measurement results could be used to estimate unfrozen water saturation (UWS) based on Archie’s law, weighted equation (WE), or Kuster-Toksoz equations (KT). However, the estimated UWS from different methods is not always consistent. The difference can be up to 20%. It might be due to the fact that UWS is not the only parameter influencing the electrical and acoustic properties. In order to obtain consistent UWS, a joint model that combines the electrical effective medium theory (EMT) and the acoustic self-consistent approximation (SCA) is proposed. In this method, UWS and aspect ratio which describes particles shape are found simultaneously from the joint SCA-EMT model. Most of the results from the proposed method are between that of Archie’s law and WE method, which indicates that the electrical method might overestimate UWS and acoustic method might underestimate it.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)nb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofCold Regions Engineering 2019
dc.titleJoint Acoustic and Electrical Measurements for Unfrozen Water Saturation Estimate—A Reviewnb_NO
dc.typeChapternb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber26-34nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/9780784482599.004
dc.identifier.cristin1721295
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 262644nb_NO
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/773421nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2019. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784482599.004nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,91,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for bygg- og miljøteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record