Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLandøy, Ane
dc.contributor.authorGastinger, Almuth
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T07:57:20Z
dc.date.available2019-07-09T07:57:20Z
dc.date.created2019-06-14T13:48:11Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationCommunications in Computer and Information Science. 2019, 989 340-344.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1865-0929
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2603834
dc.description.abstractFor several years, there has been a debate about digital vs. print format for study materials. The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS) has shown that students clearly are in favour of paper, both in Norway and many other countries. These preferences have various implications not only for collection development decisions, but also for the availability of space in academic libraries. Study literature offered in digital format has huge advantages. It is not only more available, but makes it also makes it possible to free up much needed floor and shelving space in physical libraries. It also reduces the time and work spent on handling physical literature, from acquisition to re-shelving. So how can these advantages be balanced with students’ reading preferences? The authors discuss these challenges and suggest to developing training sessions on “How to use digital study literature?” Some Norwegian universities have already done this, and their results will be described.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSpringernb_NO
dc.titlePrint or Electronic Course Readings: Implications for Library Space and Information Literacy Programmesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber340-344nb_NO
dc.source.volume989nb_NO
dc.source.journalCommunications in Computer and Information Sciencenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-13472-3_32
dc.identifier.cristin1705010
dc.description.localcodeThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Communications in Computer and Information Science. Locked until 20 February 2020 due to copyright restrictions. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13472-3_32.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,14,30,0
cristin.unitnameNTNU Universitetsbiblioteket
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel