Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBechshoft, Thea
dc.contributor.authorDerocher, Andrew E.
dc.contributor.authorViengkone, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorRoutti, Heli Anna Irmeli
dc.contributor.authorAars, Jon
dc.contributor.authorLetcher, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorDietz, Rune
dc.contributor.authorSonne, Christian
dc.contributor.authorJenssen, Bjørn Munro
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Evan
dc.contributor.authorLunn, Nicholas J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-31T08:39:20Z
dc.date.available2019-05-31T08:39:20Z
dc.date.created2018-05-23T09:27:41Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Reviews. 2018, 26 (1), .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1181-8700
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2599507
dc.description.abstractEcotoxicology evolved as a scientific field as awareness of the unintended effects of anthropogenic pollutants in biota increased. Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) are often the focus of Arctic contaminant exposure studies because they are apex predators with high contaminant loads. While early studies focused on describing and quantifying pollutants, present-day polar bear toxicological papers often incorporate ecological variables. This systematic literature review investigates the ecological and physiological variables that have been integrated in such studies. The systematic literature search resulted in 207 papers, published between 1970 and 2016. Representation of each of the 19 polar bear subpopulations varied from 0 to 72 papers; East Greenland, Barents Sea, Southern Beaufort Sea, and Lancaster Sound had the most published research, with over 30 papers each. Samples were collected between 1881 and 2015, primarily from harvested bears (66%); most from the 1990s and 2000s. Adipose tissue, liver, and blood were the most common tissues examined, and mean number of bears analyzed per paper was 76 (range 1–691). Papers investigating temporal trends did so using a mean sample of 61 bears over a 6-year period.The frequency with which ecological and physiological variables were integrated into toxicological papers varied. Age and (or) sex was the only ecological variable(s) considered in 51% of papers. Further, a total of 37% of the papers included in the review investigated physiological effects in relation to contaminant concentrations. Of the papers, 98% dealt with contaminant exposure at the individual level, leaving population level effects largely unstudied. Solitary subadult and adult polar bears were included in 57% and 79% of the papers, respectively. Younger bears were included in fewer papers: yearlings in 20% and cubs-of-the-year in 13%. Only 12% of the papers examined reproduction relative to contaminants. Finally, body condition was included in 26% of the research papers, whereas variables related to polar bear diet were included in ≤9%. Based on our findings, we suggest future polar bear toxicology studies increase sample sizes, include more ecological variables, increase studies on family groups, and increase the applicability of studies to management and conservation by examining pollution effects on reproduction and survival.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherCanadian Science Publishingnb_NO
dc.titleOn the integration of ecological and physiological variables in polar bear toxicology research: a systematic reviewnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber12nb_NO
dc.source.volume26nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Reviewsnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/er-2016-0118
dc.identifier.cristin1586113
dc.description.localcode© 2017. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,66,10,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for biologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel