Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPritchard, Ray
dc.contributor.authorFrøyen, Yngve Karl
dc.contributor.authorSnizek, Bernhard
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T06:18:04Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T06:18:04Z
dc.date.created2019-05-08T08:52:11Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2019, 8 (5), .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2220-9964
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2598621
dc.description.abstractBicycle Level of Service (BLOS) indicators are used to provide objective ratings of the bicycle suitability (or quality) of links or intersections in transport networks. This article uses empirical bicycle route choice data from 467 university students in Trondheim, Norway to test the applicability of BLOS rating schemes for the estimation of whole-journey route choice. The methods evaluated share a common trait of being applicable for mixed traffic urban environments: Bicycle Compatibility Index (BCI), Bicycle Stress Level (BSL), Sixth Edition Highway Capacity Manual (HCM6), and Level of Traffic Stress (LTS). Routes are generated based on BLOS-weighted networks and the suitability of these routes is determined by finding the percentage overlap with empirical route choices. The results show that BCI provides the best match with empirical route data in all five origin–destination pairs, followed by HCM6. BSL and LTS which are not empirically founded have a lower match rate, although the differences between the four methods are relatively small. By iterating the detour rate that cyclists are assumed to be willing to make, it is found that the best match with modeled BLOS routes is achieved between 15 and 21% additional length. This falls within the range suggested by existing empirical research on willingness to deviate from the shortest path, however, it is uncertain whether the method will deliver the comparable findings in other cycling environments.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractBicycle Level of Service for Route Choice—A GIS Evaluation of Four Existing Indicators with Empirical Datanb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherMDPInb_NO
dc.relation.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/8/5/214
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBicycle Level of Service for Route Choice—A GIS Evaluation of Four Existing Indicators with Empirical Datanb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber20nb_NO
dc.source.volume8nb_NO
dc.source.journalISPRS International Journal of Geo-Informationnb_NO
dc.source.issue5nb_NO
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8050214
dc.identifier.cristin1696221
dc.description.localcode© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,61,50,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for arkitektur og planlegging
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal