Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Cecilie
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-26T08:09:44Z
dc.date.available2019-04-26T08:09:44Z
dc.date.created2018-01-08T11:15:57Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of education policy. 2018, .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0268-0939
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2595618
dc.description.abstractInternationally, the autonomy of schools and teachers is under pressure. In Norway, recent policies emphasise output control through national testing, combined with holding schools and teachers accountable for students’ results. Whereas recent research documents that the autonomy of schools and teachers is weakening in Oslo, there is little research on the rural parts of Norway. Recent political intentions aim to improve the results by establishing a better learning environment and classroom management. These intentions are related to the regulative discourse, ‘the rules of social order’, which is crucial to control as it dominates the instructional discourse. Two different projects were implemented in a rural municipality. Analysing their positions on three levels (author, actor and identity) this study finds considerable autonomy from the state in the pedagogic recontextualising field. However, this autonomy may be fragile as the teachers seem to have surrendered personal values. If teachers are disciplined, then the state may effectively reduce the potential discursive gap by reducing the autonomy of key agents in education. Investigating teachers’ rationalisations is imperative if we are to understand the relations between interests, ideology and class, and thereby the potential for autonomy in the recontextualising field in a performativity culture.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisnb_NO
dc.titleA fragile autonomy in a performativity culture? Exploring positions in the recontextualising field in a Norwegian rural municipalitynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber20nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of education policynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02680939.2017.1422152
dc.identifier.cristin1537504
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 4.7.2019 due to copyright restrictions. This is an [Accepted Manuscript] of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [ Journal of education policy] on [04 Jan 2018], available at https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1422152nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,80,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for lærerutdanning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel