Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVilla, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorPinardi, Monica
dc.contributor.authorBolpagni, Rossano
dc.contributor.authorGillier, Jean-Marc
dc.contributor.authorZinke, Peggy
dc.contributor.authorNedelcut, Florin
dc.contributor.authorBresciani, Mariano
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-10T13:59:00Z
dc.date.available2019-04-10T13:59:00Z
dc.date.created2018-08-06T10:21:49Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing of Environment. 2018, 216 230-244.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0034-4257
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2594091
dc.description.abstractThe improved spatial and temporal resolution of latest-generation Earth Observation missions, such as Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2, has increased the potential of remote sensing for mapping land surface phenology in inland water systems. The ability of a time series of medium-resolution satellite data to generate quantitative information on macrophyte phenology was examined, focusing on three temperate shallow lakes with connected wetlands in Italy, France, and Romania. Leaf area index (LAI) maps for floating and emergent macrophyte growth forms were derived from a semi-empirical regression model based on the best-performing spectral index, with an error level of 0.11 m2 m−2. Phenology metrics were computed from LAI time series using TIMESAT to analyze the seasonal dynamics of macrophyte spatial distribution patterns and species-dependent variability. Particular seasonal patterns seen in the autochthonous and allochthonous species across the three study areas related to local ecological and hydrological conditions. How characteristics of the satellite dataset (cloud cover threshold, temporal resolution, and missing acquisitions) influenced the phenology metrics obtained was also assessed. Our results indicate that, with a full-resolution time series (5-day revisit time), cloud cover introduced a bias in the phenology metrics of less than 2 days. Even when the temporal resolution was reduced to 15 days (like the Landsat revisit time) the timing of the start and the peak of macrophyte growth could still be mapped with an error of no more than 2–3 days.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAssessing macrophyte seasonal dynamics using dense time series of medium resolution satellite datanb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber230-244nb_NO
dc.source.volume216nb_NO
dc.source.journalRemote Sensing of Environmentnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.048
dc.identifier.cristin1599840
dc.description.localcode© 2018. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 11.7.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,91,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for bygg- og miljøteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal