Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChenoweth, Erica
dc.contributor.authorPinckney, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Orion A
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T12:23:38Z
dc.date.available2019-03-05T12:23:38Z
dc.date.created2018-05-04T11:40:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Peace Research. 2018, 55 (4), 524-534.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0022-3433
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2588760
dc.description.abstractAlthough the empirical study of strategic nonviolent action has expanded in recent years, no current dataset provides detailed accounts of the day-to-day methods and tactics used by various nonviolent and violent actors seeking political change. We introduce the Nonviolent and Violent Campaigns and Outcomes (NAVCO) version 3.0 dataset, which assembles over 100,000 hand-coded observations of nonviolent and violent methods in 21 countries around the world between 1991 and 2012. Researchers can use these data and their associated coding framework to (1) replicate or challenge existing findings about nonviolent and violent action; (2) test or uncover novel insights about the dynamics of violent and nonviolent action; and (3) recode existing protest events databases to capture specific variations in risk and disruption across event types. In particular, scholars can use these data to better understand which types of lower-level interactions between dissidents and regimes lead to large-scale mobilization; which sequences of nonviolent methods are most effective; and which types of spatial and participation diffusion yield the highest likelihood of success.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsnb_NO
dc.titleDays of Rage: Introducing the NAVCO 3.0 Datasetnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber524-534nb_NO
dc.source.volume55nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Peace Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0022343318759411
dc.identifier.cristin1583451
dc.description.localcode© 2018. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022343318759411nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel