Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRøttereng, Jo-Kristian Stræte
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T15:16:25Z
dc.date.available2019-02-21T15:16:25Z
dc.date.created2017-12-04T12:01:51Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Environmental Politics. 2018, 18 (1), 52-75.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1526-3800
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2586861
dc.description.abstractThis article presents an analysis of twenty-six industrialized countries’ support for the carbon-sequestration-based mitigation measures carbon capture and storage (CCS) and reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) during the 2007–2014 period. The article explores whether these proposed solutions to climate change share characteristics that make them feasible for reasons that can be observed in cross-national patterns. Insights from political economy, public policy, and international relations form a “triply engaged” theoretical framework. Relationships are tested using bivariate statistics and multivariate regressions. The analysis reveals that the same states show stronger support for both CCS and REDD+, and mostly for the same reasons. Proponents of such measures are generally petroleum-producing, large, and affluent, and they do not take on more ambitious mitigation targets. This article is the first to suggest that the widely different carbon-sink-based mitigation measures CCS and REDD+ may share similar political functions in similar political contexts.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press)nb_NO
dc.titleThe comparative politics of climate change mitigation measures: Who promotes carbon sinks and why?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber52-75nb_NO
dc.source.volume18nb_NO
dc.source.journalGlobal Environmental Politicsnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/GLEP_a_00444
dc.identifier.cristin1522426
dc.description.localcodePublished by Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press).nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel