Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSteinhorst, Julia
dc.contributor.authorKløckner, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-01T13:20:17Z
dc.date.available2019-02-01T13:20:17Z
dc.date.created2018-12-18T11:22:35Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEnvironment and Behavior. 2018, 50 (9), 997-1031.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0013-9165
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2583521
dc.description.abstractMonetary incentives can reduce the performance of pro-environmental behavior, but it remains unclear if they undermine pro-environmental intrinsic motivation. In this longitudinal intervention study, we investigated how monetarily versus environmentally framed behavioral information influences pro-environmental intrinsic motivation, intentions, and behavior. Clients of a local German energy provider (N = 657) were randomly assigned to receive electricity saving tips, combined with a savings potential in € (monetary framing) or in CO2 (environmental framing). Both types of framed tips positively influenced long-term electricity saving intentions (after 9 months), compared with a control group (receiving no tips), but not behavioral change (n = 285). Monetarily framed tips did not reduce pro-environmental intrinsic motivation (vs. a control group), but only environmentally framed tips increased pro-environmental intrinsic motivation, which mediated effects on intentions. Hence, environmental framing of behavioral interventions may be preferred when promoting long-term pro-environmental behavior without continuous monetary benefits. Otherwise, both framing strategies can be equally effective.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsnb_NO
dc.titleEffects of Monetary Versus Environmental Information Framing: Implications for Long-Term Pro-Environmental Behavior and Intrinsic Motivationnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber997-1031nb_NO
dc.source.volume50nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnvironment and Behaviornb_NO
dc.source.issue9nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0013916517725371
dc.identifier.cristin1644749
dc.description.localcode© 2018. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0013916517725371nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel