Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFermann, Gunnar
dc.contributor.authorFrost-Nielsen, Per Marius
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T08:02:07Z
dc.date.available2019-01-31T08:02:07Z
dc.date.created2018-10-02T16:17:01Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationContemporary Security Policy. 2018, 40 (1), .nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1352-3260
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2583229
dc.description.abstractThe upsurge in post-Cold War coalition operations has stimulated research on phenomena resembling national reservations on the use of force – caveats – in multinational military operations. However, because the concept of caveats has no agreed-upon definition among security scholars, the concept of caveats is used inconsistently which in turn impedes comparing research findings across studies and systematic research. The present article is a contribution to the scholarly debate on how caveats as national reservations on the use of force in military coalition operations are to be delimited. We also suggest that caveats are empirically observed and measured in two ways: First, we argue that coalition rules of engagement (ROE) be used as a yardstick for measuring direct reservations on the use of force. Second, we suggest reservations on task-assignment and geographical mobility be used to register indirect reservations.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisnb_NO
dc.subjectNasjonale reservasjoner på maktbruknb_NO
dc.subjectCaveatsnb_NO
dc.subjectSikkerhetspolitikknb_NO
dc.subjectSecurity policiesnb_NO
dc.subjectForsvarspolitikknb_NO
dc.subjectDefence politicsnb_NO
dc.titleConceptualizing caveats for political research: Defining and measuring national reservations on the use of force during military operationsnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeConceptualizing caveats for political research: Defining and measuring national reservations on the use of force during military operationsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Internasjonal politikk: 243nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::International politics: 243nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber14nb_NO
dc.source.volume40nb_NO
dc.source.journalContemporary Security Policynb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13523260.2018.1523976
dc.identifier.cristin1617333
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 21.3.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This is an [Accepted Manuscript] of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [Contemporary Security Policy] on [25 Sep 2018], available at https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2018.1523976nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel