Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFyhn, Håkon
dc.contributor.authorSøraa, Roger Andre
dc.contributor.authorSolli, Jøran
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-05T09:19:13Z
dc.date.available2019-01-05T09:19:13Z
dc.date.created2018-11-22T11:38:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Research & Social Science. 2018, 49 134-142.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2214-6296
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2579310
dc.description.abstractRetrofitting private homes to meet strict energy demands is a prioritised goal in climate mitigation policy. In this article we approach the challenge by analysing how retrofitting is framed differently by the government, homeowners and craftspeople acting as energy consultants. We follow a programme designed to support substantial retrofitting of homes in Norway from its introduction in 2012 through 2016, documenting how the programme was developed and modified to make it attractive for homeowners, and how it somehow never succeeded in becoming attractive. We suggest framing analysis in order to highlight the challenges government actors face in aligning their policy to homeowners and intermediaries. We find that the governmental framing of energy retrofitting is characterized by a particular distance between a handful of bureaucrats and 2.2 million private homes to be governed; we call this a ‘distance in scale’. Three distinct ‘bridging’ activities are set up to handle this distance. We suggest that difficulties in aligning with the framings of homeowners and intermediaries relates to the dynamic between these bridges. We point out how it is necessary to consider and coordinate the various framings of all stakeholders when implementing energy policy.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleWhy energy retrofitting in private dwellings is difficult in Norway: Coordinating the framing practices of government, craftspeople and homeownersnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber134-142nb_NO
dc.source.volume49nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergy Research & Social Sciencenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.022
dc.identifier.cristin1633685
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 235514nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2018. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 21.11.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,62,40,0
cristin.unitcode194,62,60,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for tverrfaglige kulturstudier
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for språk og litteratur
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal