Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBakka, Haakon
dc.contributor.authorRue, Håvard
dc.contributor.authorFuglstad, Geir-Arne
dc.contributor.authorRiebler, Andrea Ingeborg
dc.contributor.authorBolin, David
dc.contributor.authorIllian, Janine B.
dc.contributor.authorKrainski, Elias Teixeira
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLindgren, Finn
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-19T14:32:02Z
dc.date.available2018-12-19T14:32:02Z
dc.date.created2018-06-06T12:51:20Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2018, 10:e1443 (6), 1-33.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1939-5108
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2578372
dc.description.abstractComing up with Bayesian models for spatial data is easy, but performing inference with them can be challenging. Writing fast inference code for a complex spatial model with realistically‐sized datasets from scratch is time‐consuming, and if changes are made to the model, there is little guarantee that the code performs well. The key advantages of R‐INLA are the ease with which complex models can be created and modified, without the need to write complex code, and the speed at which inference can be done even for spatial problems with hundreds of thousands of observations. R‐INLA handles latent Gaussian models, where fixed effects, structured and unstructured Gaussian random effects are combined linearly in a linear predictor, and the elements of the linear predictor are observed through one or more likelihoods. The structured random effects can be both standard areal model such as the Besag and the BYM models, and geostatistical models from a subset of the Matérn Gaussian random fields. In this review, we discuss the large success of spatial modeling with R‐INLA and the types of spatial models that can be fitted, we give an overview of recent developments for areal models, and we give an overview of the stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) approach and some of the ways it can be extended beyond the assumptions of isotropy and separability. In particular, we describe how slight changes to the SPDE approach leads to straight‐forward approaches for nonstationary spatial models and nonseparable space–time models.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWileynb_NO
dc.titleSpatial modelling with R-INLA: A reviewnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-33nb_NO
dc.source.volume10:e1443nb_NO
dc.source.journalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statisticsnb_NO
dc.source.issue6nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/wics.1443
dc.identifier.cristin1589425
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 240873nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeLocked until 5.7.2019 due to copyright restrictions. This is the peer reviewed version of an article, which has been published in final form at [https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1443]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,63,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for matematiske fag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel