Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHabberstad, Ragnhild H
dc.contributor.authorFrøseth, Trude Camilla Salvesen
dc.contributor.authorAass, Nina Kathrine
dc.contributor.authorAbramova, Tatiana Mikhailovna
dc.contributor.authorBaas, Theo
dc.contributor.authorMørkeset, Siri Tessem
dc.contributor.authorCaraceni, Augusto
dc.contributor.authorLaird, Barry J
dc.contributor.authorBoland, Jason W.
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Romina
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Alonso, Elena
dc.contributor.authorStensheim, Hanne
dc.contributor.authorLoge, Jon Håvard
dc.contributor.authorHjermstad, Marianne Jensen
dc.contributor.authorBjerkeset, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorBye, Asta
dc.contributor.authorLund, Jo-Åsmund
dc.contributor.authorSolheim, Tora Skeidsvoll
dc.contributor.authorVagnildhaug, Ola Magne
dc.contributor.authorBrunelli, Cinzia
dc.contributor.authorDamås, Jan Kristian
dc.contributor.authorMollnes, Tom Eirik
dc.contributor.authorKaasa, Stein
dc.contributor.authorKlepstad, Pål
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T12:33:45Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T12:33:45Z
dc.date.created2018-10-23T13:17:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBMC Palliative Care. 2018, 17:110 1-11.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1472-684X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2574593
dc.description.abstractBackground Radiation therapy (RT) results in pain relief for about 6 of 10 patients with cancer induced bone pain (CIBP) caused by bone metastases. The high number of non-responders, the long median time from RT to pain response and the risk of adverse effects, makes it important to determine predictors of treatment response. Clinical features such as cancer type, performance status and pain intensity, and biomarkers for osteoclast activity are proposed as predictors of response to RT. However, results are inconsistent and there is a need for better predictors of RT response. A similar argument can be stated for the development of cachexia; there are currently no predictors that can identify patients who will develop cachexia later in the cancer disease trajectory. Experimental and preclinical studies show that pain, depression and cachexia are related to inflammation. However, it is not known if inflammatory biomarkers can predict CIBP, depression or development of cachexia. Methods This multicenter, multinational longitudinal observational study will include 600 adult patients receiving RT for CIBP. Demographic data, clinical variables, osteoclast and inflammatory biomarkers will be assessed before start of RT, and 3, 8, 16, 24 and 52 weeks after last course of RT. The primary aim of the study is to identify potential predictors for pain relief from RT. Secondary aims are to explore potential predictors for development of cachexia, the longitudinal relationship between pain intensity and depression, and if inflammatory biomarkers are associated with changes in pain intensity, cachexia and depression during one-year follow up. Discussion The immediate clinical implication of the PRAIS study is to identify potential predictive factors for a RT response on CIBP, and thereby reduce non-efficacious RT. Patient benefits are fewer hospital visits, reduced risk of adverse effects and more individualized pain treatment. The long-term clinical implication of the PRAIS study is to improve the knowledge about inflammation in relation to CIBP, cachexia and depression and potentially identify associations and mechanisms that can be targeted for treatment.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBMC (part of Springer Nature)nb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study (PRAIS) - Protocol for a longitudinal observational multicenter study on patients with cancer induced bone pain 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1103 Clinical Sciencesnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeThe Palliative Radiotherapy and Inflammation Study (PRAIS) - Protocol for a longitudinal observational multicenter study on patients with cancer induced bone pain 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1103 Clinical Sciencesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-11nb_NO
dc.source.volume17:110nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Palliative Carenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12904-018-0362-9
dc.identifier.cristin1622666
dc.description.localcode© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,15,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal