Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGibory, Moustafa
dc.contributor.authorHaltbakk, Ildri
dc.contributor.authorFlem, Elmira
dc.contributor.authorVainio, Kirsti
dc.contributor.authorValcarcel Salamanca, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorStørdal, Ketil
dc.contributor.authorNordbø, Svein Arne
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Kirsti
dc.contributor.authorHaarr, Elisebet
dc.contributor.authorDudman, Susanne Gjeruldsen
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-27T07:30:45Z
dc.date.available2018-09-27T07:30:45Z
dc.date.created2017-11-10T13:17:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Virology. 2017, 97 50-53.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1386-6532
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2564843
dc.description.abstractBackground Bulk stool specimens are traditionally used for rotavirus detection but may be challenging to obtain from young children. Immediate and easy sampling may however be required in different situations, such as outbreak investigation. Objectives We assessed the diagnostic performance of rectal swabs compared to bulk stools for the detection of rotavirus by Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) and multiplex semi-nested reverse transcription PCR (semi-nested RT-PCR) in children recruited through active hospital-based surveillance of acute gastroenteritis in Norway. Study design We obtained 265 paired bulk stool and rectal swab specimens from children under 5 years of age hospitalized with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Both types of specimens were analyzed for rotavirus by EIA and semi-nested RT-PCR. In addition, VP6-spesific real-time PCR was used to evaluate the detection performance in the two specimen types. Results Concordant results were obtained in 257 (97%) paired specimens by EIA and in 248 (94%) pairs by semi-nested RT-PCR. Results of VP6-specific real-time PCR obtained from 100 pairs of specimens showed concordance in 91% of the pairs. Sensitivity and specificity for rectal swab specimens were 95% and 100% by EIA; 95% and 92% by semi-nested RT-PCR, respectively. Conclusion Both EIA and semi-nested RT-PCR showed a high accuracy, and rectal swab specimens are appropriate for rotavirus diagnosis and may be used as an alternate specimen type when collection of bulk stool is not feasible.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRotavirus detection in bulk stool and rectal swab specimens in children with acute gastroenteritis in Norwaynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber50-53nb_NO
dc.source.volume97nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Clinical Virologynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcv.2017.10.017
dc.identifier.cristin1512967
dc.description.localcode© 2017. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 1.11.2018 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal