Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoen, Frode
dc.contributor.authorReistad, Ida Bruem
dc.contributor.authorMyhre, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorAllgood, Eleanor
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T07:04:51Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T07:04:51Z
dc.date.created2017-01-05T14:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0193-2713
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2561358
dc.description.abstractThis study explores coaches’ subjective views about how they acquire knowledge for their coaching practice. A Q sample of 45 opinions about different sources for knowledge acquisition, and how such sources affect learning at personal, relational, and content knowledge levels, was presented to sport coaches. Forty-five coaches from 11 different sports on both elite and national medium levels were asked to consider and rank-order the statements through a Q sorting procedure. Following Centroid factor extraction and Varimax rotation, a three-factor solution was chosen. The factors reflected three points of view about sources of knowledge acquisition for coaching practice. Some implications for coaching practice are noted and discussed.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherDepartment of Political Science, Kent State Univernb_NO
dc.titleViews about knowledge acquisition for coaching practicenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.journalOperant Subjectivitynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.15133/j.os.2016.011
dc.identifier.cristin1421725
dc.description.localcode© 2016 The International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity © 2016 The Authorsnb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,70,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,30,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for pedagogikk og livslang læring
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for nevromedisin og bevegelsesvitenskap
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record