Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLausselet, Carine
dc.contributor.authorCherubini, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorOreggioni, Gabriel David
dc.contributor.authordel Alamo Serrano, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorBecidan, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHu, Xiangping
dc.contributor.authorRørstad, Per Kr.
dc.contributor.authorStrømman, Anders Hammer
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-20T14:54:22Z
dc.date.available2018-02-20T14:54:22Z
dc.date.created2017-08-15T14:49:51Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationResources, Conservation and Recycling. 2017, 126 50-61.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0921-3449
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2486071
dc.description.abstractRecently, the European Commission has adopted a Circular Economy package. In addition, climate change is regarded as a major global challenge, and the de-carbonization of the energy sector requires a massive transformation that involves an increase of renewable shares in the energy mix and the incorporation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) processes. Given all this strong new momentum, what will the Norwegian waste-to-energy (WtE) look like in a decade? What threats and opportunities are foreseen? In an attempt to answer these questions, this study combines process-based life-cycle assessment with analysis of the overall energy and material balances, mathematical optimization and cost assessment in four scenarios: (1) the current situation of the Norwegian WtE sector, (2) the implications of the circular economy, (3) the addition of CCS on the current WtE system and (4) a landfill scenario. Except for climate change, the CCS scenario performs worse than the WtE scenario. The energy recovering scenarios perform better than the recycling scenario for (1) freshwater eutrophication and human toxicity potentials due to secondary waste streams and (2) ozone depletion potential due to the additional fossil fuel used in the recycling processes. The inclusion of the near-term climate forcers decreases the climate change impacts by 1% to 13% due to a net cooling mainly induced by NOx. Circular economy may actually give the WtE system the opportunity to strengthen and expand its role towards new or little developed value chains such as secondary raw materials production and valorization of new waste streams occurring in material recycling.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleNorwegian Waste-to-Energy: Climate change, circular economy and carbon capture and storagenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber50-61nb_NO
dc.source.volume126nb_NO
dc.source.journalResources, Conservation and Recyclingnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.025
dc.identifier.cristin1486434
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 193817nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2017. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 29.7.2019 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for energi- og prosessteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal