Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLindgård, Jan
dc.contributor.authorNixon, Philip J
dc.contributor.authorBorchers, Ingmar
dc.contributor.authorSchouenborg, Björn
dc.contributor.authorWigum, Børge Johannes
dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Marit
dc.contributor.authorAkesson, Urban
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T08:08:52Z
dc.date.available2018-02-07T08:08:52Z
dc.date.created2010-06-23T12:38:47Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationCement and Concrete Research. 2010, 40 (4), 611-635.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0008-8846
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2483120
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the main findings in the EU PARTNER Project (2002–2006) providing the basis for a unified European test approach for evaluating the potential alkali-reactivity of aggregates. The project evaluated the tests developed by RILEM and some regional tests for their suitability for use with the wide variety of aggregates and geological types found across Europe. The project had 24 partners from 14 countries, covering most of Europe, from Iceland to Greece. 22 different types of aggregates from 10 different European countries were evaluated. It was found that in most cases the RILEM tests could successfully identify the reactivity of the aggregates tested. They were most successful with normally reactive and non-reactive aggregates, but with aggregates that react very slowly an extended test period may be necessary for some of the RILEM methods. Overall, the accelerated mortar bar test and the accelerated concrete prism test seemed most effective and to have the best precision.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe EU "PARTNER" Project - European standard tests to prevent alkali reactions in aggregates: Final results and recommendationsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber611-635nb_NO
dc.source.volume40nb_NO
dc.source.journalCement and Concrete Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.09.004
dc.identifier.cristin340386
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 174878nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2009. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,90,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for geovitenskap og petroleum
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal