dc.contributor.author | Mitrovic, Branko | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-23T11:33:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-23T11:33:17Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-12-14T13:59:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Philosophy of the social sciences. 2017, 47 (1), 28-43. | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.issn | 0048-3931 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2479029 | |
dc.description.abstract | In recent decades, a number of authors have relied on the multiple realizability argument to reject methodological individualism. In this article, I argue that this strategy results in serious difficulties and makes it impossible to identify social entities and phenomena. | nb_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | nb_NO |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | nb_NO |
dc.title | Is multiple realizability a valid argument against methodological individualism? | nb_NO |
dc.type | Journal article | nb_NO |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | nb_NO |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | nb_NO |
dc.source.pagenumber | 28-43 | nb_NO |
dc.source.volume | 47 | nb_NO |
dc.source.journal | Philosophy of the social sciences | nb_NO |
dc.source.issue | 1 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0048393116643591 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1412748 | |
dc.description.localcode | © 2016. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0048393116643591 | nb_NO |
cristin.unitcode | 194,61,55,0 | |
cristin.unitname | Institutt for arkitektur og teknologi | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 2 | |