Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEgging, Ruud
dc.contributor.authorPichler, Alois
dc.contributor.authorKalvø, Øyvind Iversen
dc.contributor.authorWalle-Hansen, Thomas Meyer
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-08T09:02:53Z
dc.date.available2018-01-08T09:02:53Z
dc.date.created2017-01-13T11:57:29Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Operational Research. 2017, 259 (1), 367-383.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0377-2217
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2476115
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a natural gas market equilibrium model that considers uncertainty in shale gas reserve exploration. Risk aversion is modeled using a risk measure known as the Average Value-at-Risk (also referred to as the Conditional Value-at-Risk). In the context of the European natural gas market, we show how risk aversion affects investment behavior of a Polish and a Ukrainian natural gas supplier. As expected, increased risk aversion leads generally to lower investment, and a larger share of investments in the form of lower risk alternatives, i.e., conventional resources. However, in our market setting where multiple risk-averse agents each maximize their own profits we do observe some counter-intuitive, non-monotonic results. It is noteworthy that in a competitive market, risk aversion leads to significantly lower reserve exploration, which may be interpreted as a credible threat by a large dominating supplier (such as Russia). A threat to flood natural gas markets could deter importing countries from extending their own reserve bases.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRisk aversion in imperfect natural gas marketsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber367-383nb_NO
dc.source.volume259nb_NO
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Operational Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejor.2016.10.020
dc.identifier.cristin1426624
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 209697nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2016. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 19.10.2018 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,60,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for industriell økonomi og teknologiledelse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal