Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCepuritis, Rolands
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorSpangenberg, Jon
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-03T11:49:49Z
dc.date.available2018-01-03T11:49:49Z
dc.date.created2017-09-11T11:56:50Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationNordic Concrete Research. 2017, Proceedings of the XXIII Nordic Concrete Research Symposium, Part 4, 349-352.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0800-6377
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2474333
dc.description.abstractAccording to the Particle-Matrix Model (PMM) philosophy, the workability of concrete depends on the properties of two phases and the volumetric ratio between them: the fluid matrix phase (≤ 0.125 mm) and the solid particle phase (> 0.125 mm). The model has been successfully applied to predict concrete workability for different types of concrete, but has also indicated that some potential cases exist when its application is limited. The paper presents recent studies on improving the method by analysing how the PMM one-point flow parameter λQ can be expressed by rheological models (Bingham and Herschel-Bulkley).nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorsk Betongforeningnb_NO
dc.titleThe Particle-Matrix model: limitations and further improvements needednb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber349-352nb_NO
dc.source.volume57nb_NO
dc.source.journalNordic Concrete Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue2/17nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1492628
dc.description.localcodeThis is the accepted version of the article.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,45,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for konstruksjonsteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record