Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTabib, Mandar
dc.contributor.authorRasheed, Adil
dc.contributor.authorSiddiqui, Muhammad Salman
dc.contributor.authorKvamsdal, Trond
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-19T09:06:34Z
dc.date.available2017-12-19T09:06:34Z
dc.date.created2017-12-17T16:42:30Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Procedia. 2017, 137 477-486.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2472724
dc.description.abstractNREL 5MW reference turbine, which is a popular, realistic and standardized industrial scale offshore turbine model, is used in this work for understanding the associated flow-complexities and for testing models. For such full-scale wind-turbine, the wish list is towards a accurate real-time prediction for better control and monitoring. Here, models like 2D based strip-theory [1] can help, but the extent of its applicability can be understood through a comparative performance of 2D Vs 2.5D Vs 3D CFD models. A stand-still blade condition is chosen for this study which can arise in a wind-farm when both yaw and pitch regulations are off-line. Further, even this simple stand-still condition is expected to have complex 3D effects due to blade geometry and due to the non-optimized conditions (blades twist being optimized for rotation). For such cases, the current work compares flow-profiles and forces computed by a 3D, 2.5D and 2D CFD models along the different sections of the NREL 5 MW turbine. The 2D CFD results are compared with experimentally measured drag and lift coefficient values as reported in DOWEC report [2]. The results from this study indicates that the flow close to the hub is dominated by complex 3D structures and unsteadiness while the three dimensionality and unsteadiness diminish as one moves away from the hub and towards the tip so much so that 2D simulations are sufficient for a faithful representation of the flow behavior. However, closer to the hub 2D simulations can not be utilized without adequate corrections. The work has implications for the 2D based approaches like strip-theory.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA full-scale 3D Vs 2.5D Vs 2D analysis of flow pattern and forces for an industrial-scale 5MW NREL reference wind-turbinenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber477-486nb_NO
dc.source.volume137nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergy Procedianb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.372
dc.identifier.cristin1528532
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 216465nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,63,15,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for matematiske fag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal