Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaspersen, Eivind
dc.contributor.authorPepin, Birgit
dc.contributor.authorSikko, Svein Arne
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-14T11:26:36Z
dc.date.available2017-12-14T11:26:36Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2471712
dc.description.abstractSeveral attempts have been made to measure and categorize beliefs and practices of mathematics teachers [Swan, M. 2006. “Designing and Using Research Instruments to Describe the Beliefs and Practices of Mathematics Teachers”. Research in Education 75 (1): 58–70]. One of the reasons for measuring both beliefs and practices is to characterize teachers in terms of the relationship between their beliefs and practices. However, the practice-instruments and the beliefs-instruments discussed in the literature are predominately based on differing constructs. Consequently, it is challenging to compare the relationship between beliefs and practices solely based on these instruments. As such, we argue that practice- and beliefs-instruments based on the same construct would be desirable when both beliefs and practices are at stake. This paper presents two Rasch-calibrated instruments that measure the level of teacher-centredness with respect to student teachers’ practices and beliefs about teaching mathematics. From a sample of 160 student teachers, 15 items have been established as being beneficial for measurement, both when the items are translated as practice items and when translated as beliefs items. By studying the invariance between both translations, we conclude that measures from both instruments can be directly compared.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisnb_NO
dc.subjectPractice, beliefs, Rasch, measurementnb_NO
dc.titleMeasuring student teachers’ practices and beliefs about teaching mathematics using the Rasch modelnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber421-442nb_NO
dc.source.volume40nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Research & Method in Educationnb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1743727X.2016.1152468
dc.description.localcodeThis is an [Accepted Manuscript] of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [International Journal of Research & Method in Education] on [26 Feb 2016], available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1152468nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record