Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLervåg, Karl Yngve
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Bernhard
dc.contributor.authorMunkejord, Svend Tollak
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-04T08:54:13Z
dc.date.available2017-12-04T08:54:13Z
dc.date.created2013-06-25T11:54:43Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationComputers & Fluids. 2013, 84 (Sept), 218-230.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0045-7930
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2468881
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses the use of the level-set method for capturing the interface between two fluids. One of the advantages of the level-set method is that the curvature and the normal vector of the interface can be readily calculated from the level-set function. However, in cases where the level-set method is used to capture topological changes, the standard discretization techniques for the curvature and the normal vector do not work properly. This is because they are affected by the discontinuities of the signed-distance function half-way between two interfaces. This article addresses the calculation of normal vectors and curvatures with the level-set method for such cases. It presents a discretization scheme based on the geometry-aware curvature discretization by Macklin and Lowengrub [1]. As the present scheme is independent of the ghost-fluid method, it becomes more generally applicable, and it can be implemented into an existing level-set code more easily than Macklin and Lowengrub’s scheme [1]. The present scheme is compared with the second-order central-difference scheme and with Macklin and Lowengrub’s scheme [1], first for a case with no flow, then for a case where two drops collide in a 2D shear flow, and finally for a case where two drops collide in an axisymmetric flow. In the latter two cases, the Navier–Stokes equations for incompressible two-phase flow are solved. The article also gives a comparison of the calculation of normal vectors with the direction difference scheme presented by Macklin and Lowengrub in [2] and with the present discretization scheme. The results show that the present discretization scheme yields more robust calculations of the curvature than the second-order central difference scheme in areas where topological changes are imminent. The present scheme compares well to Macklin and Lowengrub’s method [1]. The results also demonstrate that the direction difference scheme [2] is not always sufficient to accurately calculate the normal vectors.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.titleCalculation of the interface curvature and normal vector with the level-set methodnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber218-230nb_NO
dc.source.volume84nb_NO
dc.source.journalComputers & Fluidsnb_NO
dc.source.issueSeptnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.06.004
dc.identifier.cristin1036351
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 193062nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeThis is a submitted manuscript of an article published by Elsevier Ltd in Computers & Fluids, 18 June 2013.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for energi- og prosessteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel