Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIhara, Takeshi
dc.contributor.authorGrynning, Steinar
dc.contributor.authorGao, Tao
dc.contributor.authorGustavsen, Arild
dc.contributor.authorJelle, Bjørn Petter
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-24T11:37:56Z
dc.date.available2017-11-24T11:37:56Z
dc.date.created2015-01-19T13:56:49Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEnergy and Buildings. 2015, 88 165-173.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0378-7788
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2467999
dc.description.abstractAmong currently available window systems, aerogel granulate glazing systems are considered promising for achieving good thermal and visual comfort in buildings. In aerogel granulate glazing systems, it is important to evaluate how convection in the granular-filled cavity affects their thermal performance because double glazing systems, which have a similar structure, show variable thermal properties related to the convection effect. In this study, it is shown that the granular-filled cavity hardly influences the air permeance, and therefore, convection can occur in such cavities. Nevertheless, a mock-up of commercially available aerogel granulate window shows practically identical window U-values in hot box measurement with various tilt angles. In other words, convection in the granular cavity does not affect the thermal performance of aerogel granulate glazing systems. The center-of-glass U-values are 0.28 and 0.69 W/(m2 K) for aerogel thickness of 60 and 30 mm, respectively. The total window U-values (using a wood frame) are 0.69 and 0.84 W/(m2 K) for aerogel thickness of 60 and 30 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the granular aerogel in the cavity subsided by ∼3% of its total volume after the hot box measurement. The risks posed by this subsidence under actual conditions should be assessed in later research.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.titleImpact of convection on thermal performance of aerogel granulate glazing systemsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber165-173nb_NO
dc.source.volume88nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnergy and Buildingsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.001
dc.identifier.cristin1201088
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 207551nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions (c) 2014 by Elseviernb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,61,25,0
cristin.unitcode194,64,35,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for byggekunst, historie og teknologi
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for bygg, anlegg og transport
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record