Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMachner, Alisa
dc.contributor.authorZajac, Maciej
dc.contributor.authorBen Haha, Mohsen
dc.contributor.authorKjellsen, Knut O.
dc.contributor.authorGeiker, Mette Rica
dc.contributor.authorDe Weerdt, Klaartje
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-24T07:45:45Z
dc.date.available2017-11-24T07:45:45Z
dc.date.created2017-10-04T12:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationConstruction and Building Materials. 2017, 157 214-225.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2467924
dc.description.abstractThe scarceness of high-quality limestone obliges the cement industry to consider alternative supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) for the production of blended cements. This study investigated the potential usage of dolomite instead of limestone as an addition to Portland metakaolin cement by measuring the development of the compressive strength and phase assemblages at 5 °C, 20 °C or 38 °C. Laboratory grade materials were used to identify potential differences in the impact of the carbonate on the phase assemblages. As with limestone, a strength increase was observed when dolomite is added at temperatures >5 °C due to the formation of additional carbonate AFm phases and the stabilization of ettringite. Differences were observed in the amount and type of the carbonate AFm and AFt phases formed. Thermodynamic modelling in combination with the experimental results indicate that the dolomite and limestone affect Portland metakaolin cement in a similar way, with the reactivity being the major difference between the two carbonate sources. This indicates that with regard to the strength development up to 90 days dolomite can be used instead of limestone to replace parts of a Portland metakaolin cement.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePortland metakaolin cement containing dolomite or limestone – Similarities and differences in phase assemblage and compressive strengthnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber214-225nb_NO
dc.source.volume157nb_NO
dc.source.journalConstruction and Building Materialsnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.056
dc.identifier.cristin1502180
dc.description.localcode© 2017. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. LOCKED until 22.9.2019 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,45,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for konstruksjonsteknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal