Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKorsnes, Marius
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-21T15:37:54Z
dc.date.available2017-11-21T15:37:54Z
dc.date.created2016-04-21T17:22:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationTechnological forecasting & social change. 2016, 107 50-58.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0040-1625
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2467416
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates how future-orientation generates action in China's offshore wind industry. We might expect that, with an authoritarian government, China would be able to push through policies with ease. Using the sociology of expectations and sociotechnical imaginaries, this paper shows how the future is an important resource for not only coordinating government and industry actors but also calibrating and negotiating expectations of what can be achieved. On the one hand, sociotechnical imaginaries – as exemplified by government development targets – appear to spur action; on the other hand, local expectations modify the intended development targets. The paper describes a strategic waiting game in which the government is obscure about intentions and in which the industry, wanting a piece of a promising cake, is eager to get a head start. This paper finds that ambitiousness about the future, but ambiguity in implementation, is a strategy successfully employed by the government to ensure change. The paper shows how state intervention is productively managed so that it neither stifles nor exclusively drives offshore wind industry development in China.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAmbition and ambiguity: Expectations and imaginaries developing offshore wind in Chinanb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber50-58nb_NO
dc.source.volume107nb_NO
dc.source.journalTechnological forecasting & social changenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.030
dc.identifier.cristin1351835
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 209697nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2016. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. LOCKED until 13.4.2018 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,62,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for tverrfaglige kulturstudier
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal