Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVolgyes, David
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Marius
dc.contributor.authorStray-Pedersen, Arne
dc.contributor.authorWaaler, Dag
dc.contributor.authorMartinsen, Anne Catrine Trægde
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-24T11:21:56Z
dc.date.available2017-10-24T11:21:56Z
dc.date.created2017-01-09T11:59:20Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationJournal of computer assisted tomography. 2016, 41 (1), 75-81.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0363-8715
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2461775
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate how different iterative and filtered back projection kernels affect the computed tomography (CT) numbers and low contrast detectability. Methods: Five different scans were performed at 6 different tube potentials on the same Catphan 600 phantom using approximately the same dose level and otherwise identical settings. The scans were reconstructed using all available filtered back projection body kernels and with iterative reconstruction techniques. Results: The CT numbers and the contrast-to-noise ratios were reported and how they are affected by the kernel choice and strength of iterative reconstruction. Conclusions: Iterative reconstruction improved contrast-to-noise ratio in most cases, but in certain situations, it decreased it. Variations in CT numbers can be large between kernels with similar sharpness for certain densities.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttp://journals.lww.com/jcat/Citation/2017/01000/How_Different_Iterative_and_Filtered_Back.13.aspx
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHow different iterative and filtered back projection kernels affect CT numbers and low contrast detectabilitynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber75-81nb_NO
dc.source.volume41nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of computer assisted tomographynb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/RCT.0000000000000491
dc.identifier.cristin1423253
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 221073nb_NO
dc.description.localcodeCopyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CC-BY-NC-ND)nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,18,21,70
cristin.unitcode194,18,23,30
cristin.unitnameNorwegian Media Technology Lab
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for helse, teknologi og samfunn
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal