Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBernardi, Elena
dc.contributor.authorCarlucci, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorCornaro, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorBohne, Rolf André
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T14:00:18Z
dc.date.available2017-10-18T14:00:18Z
dc.date.created2017-07-14T11:19:34Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2460905
dc.description.abstractRating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings are technical instruments that aim to evaluate the environmental impact of buildings and construction projects. In some cases, these rating systems can also cover urban-scale projects, community projects, and infrastructures. These schemes are designed to assist project management in making the projects more sustainable by providing frameworks with precise criteria for assessing the various aspects of a building’s environmental impact. Given the growing interest in sustainable development worldwide, many rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings have been established in recent years, each one with its peculiarities and fields of applicability. The present work is motivated by an interest in emphasizing such differences to better understand these rating systems and extract the main implications to building design. It also attempts to summarize in a user-friendly form the vast and fragmented assortment of information that is available today. The analysis focuses on the six main rating systems: the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM), the Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), the Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQETM), the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), and the Sustainable Building Tool (SBTool).nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherMDPInb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAn Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildingsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.volume9nb_NO
dc.source.journalSustainabilitynb_NO
dc.source.issue7nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su9071226
dc.identifier.cristin1482255
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/680529nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2017 by the authors; licensee MDPI. This article is an open Access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,35,0
cristin.unitcode194,18,25,30
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for bygg, anlegg og transport
cristin.unitnameSeksjon for bygg, geomatikk og realfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal