Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSparrevik, Lars Magnus
dc.contributor.authorEllen, Gerald Jan
dc.contributor.authorDuijn, Mike
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-16T07:49:55Z
dc.date.available2017-10-16T07:49:55Z
dc.date.created2010-09-27T03:08:05Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Technology. 2011, 45 (1), 118-124.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0013-936X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2460203
dc.description.abstractThe management of environmental pollution has changed considerably since the growth of environmental awareness in the late 1960s. The general increased environmental concern and involvement of stakeholders in today's environmental issues may enhance the need to consider risk in a much broader social context rather than just as an estimate of ecological hazard. Risk perception and the constructs and images of risks held by stakeholders and society are important items to address in the management of environmental projects, including the management of contaminated sediments. Here we present a retrospective case study that evaluates factors affecting stakeholder risk perception of contaminated sediment disposal that occurred during a remediation project in Oslo harbor, Norway. The choice to dispose dredged contaminated sediments in a confined aquatic disposal (CAD) site rather than at a land disposal site has received a lot of societal attention, attracted large media coverage, and caused many public discussions. A mixed method approach is used to investigate how risk perceptive affective factors (PAF), socio-demographic aspects, and participatory aspects have influenced the various stakeholders' preferences for the two different disposal options. Risk perceptive factors such as transparency in the decision making process and controllability of the disposal options have been identified as important for risk perception. The results of the study also support the view that there is no sharp distinction in risk perception between experts and other parties and emphasizes the importance of addressing risk perceptive affective factors in similar environmental decision-making processes. Indeed, PAFs such as transparency, openness, and information are fundamental to address in sensitive environmental decisions, such as sediment disposal alternatives, in order to progress to more technical questions such as the controllability and safety.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societynb_NO
dc.titleEvaluation of factors affecting stakeholder risk perception of contaminated sediment disposal in Oslo harbournb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber118-124nb_NO
dc.source.volume45nb_NO
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Science and Technologynb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/es100444t
dc.identifier.cristin349722
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 188946nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2010 American Chemical Society. This is the authors' accepted and refereed manuscript to the article.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,60,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for industriell økonomi og teknologiledelse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel