Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Geffen, Lisanne
dc.contributor.authorHollup, Stig Arvid
dc.contributor.authorKløckner, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-09T09:01:29Z
dc.date.available2017-10-09T09:01:29Z
dc.date.created2016-12-14T17:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationPsyecology. 2016, 7 (3), 262-281.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2171-1976
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2459110
dc.description.abstractIn a pioneering work, this study explores the potential that may be found in combining the environmental psychological concept environmental worldview with the neurocognitive study technique electroencephalography (EEG). With this research, we aim to bridge between the research traditions of environmental communication and neuro-cognition by investigating in an qEEG experiment (N = 19) if different levels of environmental worldview, measured by the NEP, influence the processing of visual climate change imagery, reflected by the theta and gamma oscillations in the frontal and parietal areas. Our results confirm the assumptions that there is a relationship between the degree of environmental worldview and visual environmental communication processing. The pattern is interpreted as an indication that people with weak pro-environmental worldviews show cognitive signs of mismatch between what is in line with their environmental worldview and what they are confronted with in the visual stimulus.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21711976.2016.1242229?needAccess=true
dc.titleHow do people with weak and strong pro-environmental worldviews process visual climate change information? An EEG studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber262-281nb_NO
dc.source.volume7nb_NO
dc.source.journalPsyecologynb_NO
dc.source.issue3nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21711976.2016.1242229
dc.identifier.cristin1412978
dc.description.localcodeThis is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psyecology on 16 Nov 2016, available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21711976.2016.1242229nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,67,40,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record