Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBusch, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorSripada, Kam
dc.contributor.authorVerhulst, Elli
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-30T08:13:17Z
dc.date.available2017-05-30T08:13:17Z
dc.date.created2017-04-26T10:34:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2443785
dc.description.abstractDuring 2015-2016, DION, the interest organization for doctoral candidates and postdoctoral researchers at NTNU, conducted an analysis of the various PhD budget (aka driftsmidler or working capital) related definitions, best practices and processes in place throughout NTNU. All faculties were invited to respond to a questionnaire regarding PhD budget practices, and a total of 7 faculty and 10 department responses (9 of which only responded to the duty work part which is covered in a concurrent report) were received. The following report presents findings from this survey. A variety of definitions and processes exists, some of which need unification and refinement. Based on the analysis as well as legacy material and DION case history, measures are proposed as summarized in the conclusion how to improve the current system for doctoral candidates.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherInterest Organization for Doctoral Candidates at NTNU (DION)nb_NO
dc.relation.urihttp://org.ntnu.no/dion/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DION-Report_PhD-Budget_160413_AB.pdf
dc.titlePhD budget regulations at NTNUnb_NO
dc.typeResearch reportnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber18nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1466638
cristin.unitcode194,64,25,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,10,0
cristin.unitcode194,64,30,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for energi- og prosessteknikk
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for laboratoriemedisin, barne- og kvinnesykdommer
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for produktdesign
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record