Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorHaukioja, Jussinb_NO
dc.contributor.authorNyquist, Mons Andreasnb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T12:39:36Z
dc.date.available2014-12-19T12:39:36Z
dc.date.created2012-09-21nb_NO
dc.date.issued2012nb_NO
dc.identifier555754nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/242839
dc.description.abstractIn the literature following Saul Kripke’s book on Wittgenstein’s rule-following discussions, much effort has been put into formulating a dispositional theory of meaning and content as a means of answering the meaning sceptic. Philip Pettit has provided a dispositional theory that distinguishes itself from other dispositional theories in that it takes speakers’ practice of checking and correcting each others’ use of words to be indicative of meaning, instead of depending on a naturalistic specification of a subset of meaningconstitutive dispositions. However, Pettit’s theory faces certain obstacles of its own. In this thesis I aim to outline Pettit’s theory and discuss what I think of as some problems with it.nb_NO
dc.languageengnb_NO
dc.publisherNorges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Det humanistiske fakultet, Filosofisk instituttnb_NO
dc.titleRule-following, dispositiosn and Pettitnb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber81nb_NO
dc.contributor.departmentNorges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Det humanistiske fakultet, Filosofisk instituttnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel