Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRimehaug, Audun Eskeland
dc.contributor.authorHoff, Ingrid E Taraldsrud
dc.contributor.authorHøiseth, Lars Øivind
dc.contributor.authorHisdal, Jonny
dc.contributor.authorAadahl, Petter
dc.contributor.authorKirkeby-Garstad, Idar
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-02T07:46:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-04T06:48:13Z
dc.date.available2016-08-02T07:46:04Z
dc.date.available2016-08-04T06:48:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationBMC Anesthesiology 2016nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1471-2253
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2397748
dc.description.abstractBackground: Changes in cardiac power parameters incorporate changes in both aortic flow and blood pressure. We hypothesized that dynamic and non-dynamic cardiac power parameters would track hypovolemia better than equivalent flow- and pressure parameters, both during spontaneous breathing and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). Methods: Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent lower body negative pressure (LBNP) of 0, −20, −40, −60 and −80 mmHg to simulate hypovolemia, both during spontaneous breathing and during NPPV. We recorded aortic flow using suprasternal ultrasound Doppler and blood pressure using Finometer, and calculated dynamic and non-dynamic parameters of cardiac power, flow and blood pressure. These were assessed on their association with LBNP-levels. Results: Respiratory variation in peak aortic flow was the dynamic parameter most affected during spontaneous breathing increasing 103 % (p < 0.001) from baseline to LBNP −80 mmHg. Respiratory variation in pulse pressure was the most affected dynamic parameter during NPPV, increasing 119 % (p < 0.001) from baseline to LBNP −80 mmHg. The cardiac power integral was the most affected non-dynamic parameter falling 59 % (p < 0.001) from baseline to LBNP −80 mmHg during spontaneous breathing, and 68 % (p < 0.001) during NPPV. Conclusions: Dynamic cardiac power parameters were not better than dynamic flow- and pressure parameters at tracking hypovolemia, seemingly due to previously unknown variation in peripheral vascular resistance matching respiratory changes in hemodynamics. Of non-dynamic parameters, the power parameters track hypovolemia slightly better than equivalent flow parameters, and far better than equivalent pressure parameters.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 3.0 Norge*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/no/*
dc.titleCardiac power parameters during hypovolemia, induced by the lower body negative pressure technique, in healthy volunteersnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2016-08-02T07:46:04Z
dc.source.journalBMC Anesthesiologynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12871-016-0195-0
dc.identifier.cristin1370029
dc.description.localcode© 2016 Rimehaug et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 3.0 Norge
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 3.0 Norge