Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKlöckner, Christian
dc.contributor.authorBlöbaum, Anke
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-17T11:52:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-29T11:17:38Z
dc.date.available2013-10-17T11:52:25Z
dc.date.available2016-04-29T11:17:38Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Psychology 2010;30(4):574-586nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0272-4944
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2388049
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines a first version of a Comprehensive Action Determination Model (CADM) of ecological behaviour that incorporates intentional, normative, situational, and habitual influences on environmentally friendly behaviour. The main assumptions of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), the norm-activation model (NAM), the theoretical concept of habit and the ipsative theory of behaviour were integrated into a comprehensive model. The model was tested using a structural equation modelling approach on a sample of 389 students in the domain of travel mode choice and compared to established less comprehensive models (TPB, NAM and a combination of both). The results show that all compared models had a good to excellent model fit and explained a substantial amount of variation in travel mode choice. The CADM, however, explained the greatest degree of variation as compared with the other models, at 65%. Subjective and objective situational constraints were responsible for most of the variation in travel mode choice in the CADM, but intentions and habits also had a significant impact. The influence of social and personal norms was mediated by habits and intention, while habits moderated the relationship between intention and behaviour. The importance of the CADM as a framework for other domains of ecological behaviour is also discussed.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.titleA comprehensive action determination model - Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choicenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2013-10-17T11:52:26Z
dc.source.pagenumber574-586nb_NO
dc.source.volume30nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Environmental Psychologynb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.001
dc.identifier.cristin347817
dc.description.localcode© Elsevier. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel