Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKodama, Yosuke
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Helene
dc.contributor.authorFurnes, Marianne Waldum
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Chun-Mei
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Gjermund
dc.contributor.authorMårvik, Ronald
dc.contributor.authorKulseng, Bård
dc.contributor.authorChen, Duan
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-06T07:53:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-21T13:03:18Z
dc.date.available2015-01-06T07:53:14Z
dc.date.available2016-04-21T13:03:18Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE 2013, 8(9)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2386817
dc.description.abstractBackground: Both gastric bypass (GB) and duodenal switch with sleeve gastrectomy (DS) have been widely used as bariatric surgeries, and DS appears to be superior to GB. The aim of this study was to better understand the mechanisms leading to body weight loss by comparing these two procedures in experimental models of rats. Methods: Animals were subjected to GB, DS or laparotomy (controls), and monitored by an open-circuit indirect calorimeter composed of comprehensive laboratory animal monitoring system and adiabatic bomb calorimeter. Results: Body weight loss was greater after DS than GB. Food intake was reduced after DS but not GB. Energy expenditure was increased after either GB or DS. Fecal energy content was increased after DS but not GB. Conclusion: GB induced body weight loss by increasing energy expenditure, whereas DS induced greater body weight loss by reducing food intake, increasing energy expenditure and causing malabsorption in rat models.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencenb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 3.0 Norge*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/no/*
dc.titleMechanistic Comparison between Gastric Bypass vs. Duodenal Switch with Sleeve Gastrectomy in Rat Modelsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2015-01-06T07:53:14Z
dc.source.volume8nb_NO
dc.source.journalPLoS ONEnb_NO
dc.source.issue9nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0072896
dc.identifier.cristin1083269
dc.description.localcode© 2013 Kodama et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 3.0 Norge
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 3.0 Norge