Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorArpaia, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorBirch, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorChesson, Andrew
dc.contributor.authordu Jardin, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorGathmann, Achim
dc.contributor.authorGropp, Jürgen
dc.contributor.authorHerman, Lieve
dc.contributor.authorHoen-Sorteberg, Hilde-Gunn
dc.contributor.authorJones, Huw
dc.contributor.authorKiss, József
dc.contributor.authorKleter, Gijs
dc.contributor.authorLøvik, Martinus
dc.contributor.authorMessean, Antoine
dc.contributor.authorNaegeli, Hanspeter
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Kåre Magne
dc.contributor.authorOvesna, Jaroslava
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Joe
dc.contributor.authorRostoks, Nils
dc.contributor.authorTebbe, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-05T07:26:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T14:19:40Z
dc.date.available2015-03-05T07:26:39Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T14:19:40Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationEFSA Journal 2014, 12(5):3680nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1831-4732
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2381882
dc.description.abstractCotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 was produced by conventional crossing. The EFSA GMO Panel previously assessed the two single cotton events GHB614 and LLCotton25 and did not identify safety concerns. Integrity of the inserts was retained in the two -event stack cotton. No differences requiring further food and feed safety assessment were identified in the compositional analysis of cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 except for a higher level of gossypol. The EFSA GMO Panel further assessed this difference and considers that it is of no safety relevance for animals and humans. Expression analysis and safety assessment of the newly express ed proteins identified no concerns regarding their potential toxicity and allergenicity. No indications of safety issues regarding the overall allergenicity of cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 were identified. There are no indications of an increased likelihood of establishment and spread of feral cotton plants. Considering the scope of the application, potential interactions of cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 with the biotic and abiotic environment were not considered a relevant issue. Environmental risks associated with an unlikely but theoretically possible horizontal gene transfer from cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 to bacteria have not been identified. The postmarket environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA)nb_NO
dc.titleScientific Opinion on application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2010-77) for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer CropSciencenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2015-03-05T07:26:39Z
dc.source.volume12nb_NO
dc.source.journalEFSA Journalnb_NO
dc.source.issue5nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3680
dc.identifier.cristin1196032
dc.description.localcode© European Food Safety Authority, 2014.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel