Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHEUCH, INGRID
dc.contributor.authorHeuch, Ivar
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Knut
dc.contributor.authorZwart, John-Anker
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-25T11:06:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-05T12:27:29Z
dc.date.available2015-11-25T11:06:19Z
dc.date.available2016-01-05T12:27:29Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE 2015, 10(10)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2372618
dc.description.abstractBackground: Previous work indicates that overweight and obese individuals carry an increased risk of experiencing chronic low back pain (LBP). It is not known, however, how the association with body size depends on the choice of anthropometric measure used. Objective: This work compares relationships with LBP for several measures of body size. Different results may indicate underlying mechanisms for the association between body size and risk of LBP. Methods: In a cohort study, baseline information was collected in the community-based HUNT2 (1995–1997) and HUNT3 (2006–2008) surveys in Norway. Participants were 10,059 women and 8725 men aged 30–69 years without LBP, and 3883 women and 2662 men with LBP at baseline. Associations with LBP at end of follow-up were assessed by generalized linear modeling, with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: Relationships between waist-hip-ratio and occurrence of LBP at end of follow-up were weak and non-significant after adjustment for age, education, work status, physical activity, smoking, lipid levels and blood pressure. Positive associations with LBP at end of follow-up were all significant for body weight, BMI, waist circumference and hip circumference after similar adjustment, both in women without and with LBP at baseline, and in men without LBP at baseline. After additional mutual adjustment for anthropometric measures, the magnitude of the association with body weight increased in women without LBP at baseline (RR: 1.130 per standard deviation, 95% CI: 0.995–1.284) and in men (RR: 1.124, 95% CI 0.976–1.294), with other measures showing weak associations only. Conclusion: Central adiposity is unlikely to play a major role in the etiology of LBP. Total fat mass may be one common factor underlying the associations observed. The association with body weight remaining after mutual adjustment may reflect mechanical or structural components behind the relationship between overweight or obesity and LBP.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencenb_NO
dc.titleA Comparison of Anthropometric Measures for Assessing the Association between Body Size and Risk of Chronic Low Back Pain: TheHUNT Studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.date.updated2015-11-25T11:06:19Z
dc.source.volume10nb_NO
dc.source.journalPLoS ONEnb_NO
dc.source.issue10nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0141268
dc.identifier.cristin1284115
dc.description.localcode© 2015 Heuch et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record