Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMjølstad, Bente Prytz
dc.contributor.authorKirkengen, Anna Luise
dc.contributor.authorGetz, Linn
dc.contributor.authorHetlevik, Irene
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-12T13:46:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-14T09:28:23Z
dc.date.available2015-10-12T13:46:32Z
dc.date.available2015-10-14T09:28:23Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal for Person Centered Healthcare 2013, 1:149-160nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2052-5656
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2356159
dc.description- Published articlenb_NO
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: Life experience and existential circumstances have an impact on health. Within medicine, however, the significance to patient care of person-related, biographical knowledge receives only rudimentary emphasis and its substantial theoretical underpinnings are inadequately understood and infrequently applied. This study explores the types and extent of some Norwegian general practitioners’ (GPs’) person-related knowledge, exemplified by patients on the GPs respective lists who are currently in a state of frail health. Methods: Nine GPs were interviewed regarding 1 of their patients who had recently been admitted to the rehabilitation unit of a nursing home. Subsequent interviews with the individual patients served both to validate the GPs’ information and as a starting point for further inquiry into patient life stories. Interview transcripts were analyzed within a phenomenological-hermeneutical framework. Results: Most GPs were able adequately to characterize the personality of their patients and had acquired substantial knowledge about their occupation and closest family relationships. The GPs tended to have less knowledge regarding patients’ interests, hobbies, social network and their relationships to their parents and siblings. They had the least knowledge about patients’ childhood, upbringing and social background. Some GPs reacted with surprise or embarrassment when becoming aware of potentially significant “knowledge holes” regarding patients whom they had known for years. Conclusions and implications: We document limitations to healthcare professionals’ eliciting of knowledge about their patients as persons. A long-term doctor-patient relationship seems to enable GPs to identify and articulate their patients’ personal characteristics. It does not ensure that the GPs will accumulate knowledge regarding those biographical facts or experiences that, particularly during transitions to other caretakers, might prove most salient to their patients’ health and treatment. We believe the findings to have relevance both for clinical practice and medical education, but further research and reflection is needed before formal changes in current practice are to be recommended.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherEuropean Journal for Person Centered Healthcarenb_NO
dc.titleWhat Do GPs Actually Know About Their Patients As Persons?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer revieweden_GB
dc.date.updated2015-10-12T13:46:32Z
dc.source.pagenumber149-160nb_NO
dc.source.volume1nb_NO
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal for Person Centered Healthcarenb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.5750/ejpch.v1i1
dc.identifier.cristin1055324


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel