Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnjum, Mariam
dc.contributor.authorAriansen, Inger
dc.contributor.authorHjellvik, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorSelmer, Randi Marie
dc.contributor.authorKjerpeseth, Lars Jøran
dc.contributor.authorSkovlund, Eva
dc.contributor.authorMyrstad, Marius
dc.contributor.authorEllekjær, Hanne
dc.contributor.authorChristophersen, Ingrid E.
dc.contributor.authorTveit, Arnljot
dc.contributor.authorBerge, Trygve
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-28T07:53:16Z
dc.date.available2024-02-28T07:53:16Z
dc.date.created2024-01-16T09:24:41Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Heart Journal. 2023, 45 (1), 57-66.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-668X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3120206
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims The benefit of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) and intermediate stroke risk is debated. In a nationwide Norwegian cohort with a non-sex CHA2DS2-VASc risk score of one, this study aimed to investigate (i) stroke and bleeding risk in AF patients with and without OAC treatment, and (ii) the risk of stroke in non-anticoagulated individuals with and without AF. Methods A total of 1 118 762 individuals including 34 460 AF patients were followed during 2011–18 until ischaemic stroke, intracranial haemorrhage, increased CHA2DS2-VASc score, or study end. One-year incidence rates (IRs) were calculated as events per 100 person-years (%/py). Cox regression models provided adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs [95% confidence intervals]). Results Among AF patients, the ischaemic stroke IR was 0.51%/py in OAC users and 1.05%/py in non-users (aHR 0.47 [0.37–0.59]). Intracranial haemorrhage IR was 0.28%/py in OAC users and 0.19%/py in non-users (aHR 1.23 [0.88–1.72]). Oral anticoagulant use was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding (aHR 1.37 [1.16–1.63]) but lower risk of the combined outcome of ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, and mortality (aHR 0.57 [0.51–0.63]). Non-anticoagulated individuals with AF had higher risk of ischaemic stroke compared to non-AF individuals with the same risk profile (aHR 2.47 [2.17–2.81]). Conclusions In AF patients at intermediate risk of stroke, OAC use was associated with overall favourable clinical outcomes. Non-anticoagulated AF patients had higher risk of ischaemic stroke compared to the general population without AF with the same risk profile.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.titleStroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation with CHA2DS2-VASC risk score of one: the Norwegian AFNOR studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeStroke and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation with CHA2DS2-VASC risk score of one: the Norwegian AFNOR studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber57-66en_US
dc.source.volume45en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean Heart Journalen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurheartj/ehad659
dc.identifier.cristin2227399
dc.relation.projectHelse Sør-Øst RHF: 26903en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record