Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKarlsson, Elin
dc.contributor.authorMäki-Torkko, Elina
dc.contributor.authorGranberg, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorWidén, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorManchaiah, Vinaya
dc.contributor.authorSwarnalatha Nagaraj, Vinay
dc.contributor.authorPichora-Fuller, Kathleen M.
dc.contributor.authorSelb, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorSwanepoel, De Wet
dc.contributor.authorYerraguntla, Krishna
dc.contributor.authorGustafsson, Johanna
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-12T13:16:55Z
dc.date.available2024-02-12T13:16:55Z
dc.date.created2024-02-06T13:40:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationEar and Hearing. 2023, 44 (6), 1498-1506.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-0202
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3117021
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Self-assessment instruments are commonly used in audiological rehabilitation. However, several studies highlight the lack of multidimensionality in existing outcome measures, with the consequence that they only partially capture aspects of functioning in everyday life for people living with hearing loss. This study aimed to develop and investigate the content validity of a self-assessment instrument based on the validated Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Core Set for Hearing Loss. Design: The design was a two-part instrument development study. The first part focused on the item-generation process of the instrument, named the Hearing and Functioning in Everyday Life Questionnaire (HFEQ) during an experts’ workshop. The second part focused on international content validation of the instrument using group interviews. Strategic sampling was used and 30 adults with hearing loss from India, South Africa, and the United States participated in the group interviews. Results: The expert’s workshop resulted in the first version of the HFEQ containing 30 items. The results from group interviews show that the content of the HFEQ was considered to be valid concerning its relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility. A majority (73%) of the HFEQ items were perceived by the participants as relevant and easy to comprehend. For the remaining 27% of the items, the content was perceived to be relevant in all countries, but some terms and expressions were reported to require rewording or clearer examples. These modifications will be made in the next step of the development process. Conclusion: Content validation of the HFEQ demonstrates promising results, with participants perceiving the content as relevant and comprehensible. Further psychometric validation is required to investigate other psychometric properties, such as construct validity and reliability. The HFEQ has the potential to become a valuable new instrument for assessing everyday functioning in people with hearing loss in audiological rehabilitation and in research.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Healthen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleHearing and Functioning in Everyday Life Questionnaire: Development and Validation of an ICF-Based Instrumenten_US
dc.title.alternativeHearing and Functioning in Everyday Life Questionnaire: Development and Validation of an ICF-Based Instrumenten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1498-1506en_US
dc.source.volume44en_US
dc.source.journalEar and Hearingen_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AUD.0000000000001391
dc.identifier.cristin2243699
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel