Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOchieng, Richard
dc.contributor.authorCerón, Alejandro L.
dc.contributor.authorKonist, Alar
dc.contributor.authorSarker, Shiplu
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-06T08:55:40Z
dc.date.available2023-11-06T08:55:40Z
dc.date.created2023-08-29T09:13:09Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3100702
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we evaluate the pyrolysis of wood biomass as a combination of drying and thermal decomposition via the Page and modified Page models for drying kinetics as well as the Friedman and Vyazovkin methods for solid-state decomposition kinetics. This approach was applied to data obtained from thermogravimetric analysis of three wood species (spruce, pine, and birch) at 5, 20, and 30 K/min temperature programs. According to the Page model, the average activation energies for spruce, pine, and birch wood between 30 and 150 °C were 12.87 ± 1.08, 13.32 ± 0.48, and 11.61 ± 0.59 kJ/mol, respectively. While all activation energies fell between 11.0 and 14.5 kJ/mol, the modified Page model predicted slightly higher energies, with an average absolute difference of 6.4% from Page's predictions. The activation energies and pre-exponential factors predicted by both models were lower at low heating rates, with the pre-exponential factor yielding significantly large differences between 5 and 30 K/min. These results showed that drying kinetics were significantly affected by heating rates. In addition, the goodness-of-fit analysis revealed that both models were reasonably accurate when predicting wood drying kinetics. For the analysis of solid-state decomposition kinetics, a comparison of Friedman's linear differential method (FR) and Vyazovkin's nonlinear integral method (NLN-INT) was conducted at temperatures higher than 150 °C. In contrast to the NLN-INT method, the FR method predicted activation energies slightly higher, with an average absolute difference of about 8.4%. Evaluation of the relative errors revealed that both the FR and NLN-INT methods performed similarly. However, the Friedman (FR) method provided a reasonable fit to multistep decomposition kinetics through the simultaneous estimation of activation energies and pre-exponential factors. Nevertheless, the activation energies estimated by both the FR and NLN-INT methods were unreliable at conversions of α < 0.15 and α > 0.85. Validation of the kinetic results was conducted with differential thermogravimetric data at a heating rate of 5 K/min.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B. V.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA combined analysis of the drying and decomposition kinetics of wood pyrolysis using non-isothermal thermogravimetric methodsen_US
dc.title.alternativeA combined analysis of the drying and decomposition kinetics of wood pyrolysis using non-isothermal thermogravimetric methodsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume20en_US
dc.source.journalEnergy Conversion and Management: Xen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100424
dc.identifier.cristin2170428
dc.source.articlenumber100424en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal