Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarris, Keith M.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Lu
dc.contributor.authorMu, Guanglun M.
dc.contributor.authorLu, Yanxia
dc.contributor.authorSo, Cheryl
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Wei
dc.contributor.authorMa, Jing
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Kefei
dc.contributor.authorWang, Wei
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Melvyn Wei-Bin
dc.contributor.authorHo, Roger C.
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-19T08:04:41Z
dc.date.available2023-05-19T08:04:41Z
dc.date.created2023-03-13T10:23:18Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2023, 18 (2), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3068290
dc.description.abstractClinicians are expected to provide accurate and useful mental health assessments, sometimes in emergency settings. The most urgent challenge may be in calculating suicide risk. Unfortunately, existing instruments often fail to meet requirements. To address this situation, we used a sustainable scale development approach to create a publicly available Suicidality Scale (SS). Following a critical review of current measures, community input, and panel discussions, an international item pool survey included 5,115 English-speaking participants aged 13–82 years. Revisions were tested with two follow-up cross-sectional surveys (Ns = 814 and 626). Pool items and SS versions were critically examined through item response theory, hierarchical cluster, factor and bifactor analyses, resulting in a unidimensional eight-item scale. Psychometric properties were high (loadings > .77; discrimination > 2.2; test-retest r = .87; internal consistency, ω = .96). Invariance checks were satisfied for age, gender, ethnicity, rural/urban residence, first language, self-reported psychiatric diagnosis and suicide attempt history. The SS showed stronger psychometric properties, and significant differences in bivariate associations with depressive symptoms, compared with included suicide measures. The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale represents a significant step forward in accurate assessment for people aged 13+, and diverse populations. This study provides an example of sustainable scale development utilizing community input, emphasis on strong psychometric evidence from diverse samples, and a free-to-use license allowing instrument revisions. These methods can be used to develop a wide variety of psychosocial instruments that can benefit clinicians, researchers, and the public.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMeasuring the suicidal mind: The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale, for adolescents and adultsen_US
dc.title.alternativeMeasuring the suicidal mind: The ‘open source’ Suicidality Scale, for adolescents and adultsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume18en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0282009
dc.identifier.cristin2133399
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal