dc.contributor.author | Wik, Tina Strømdal | |
dc.contributor.author | Klaksvik, Jomar | |
dc.contributor.author | Husby, Otto Schnell | |
dc.contributor.author | Rasch, Astrid | |
dc.contributor.author | Winther, Siri Bjørgen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-26T14:21:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-26T14:21:53Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-01-11T08:18:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Acta Orthopaedica. 2022, 93 132-137. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1745-3674 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3065165 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background and purpose — Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and revision THA are important information in the preoperative shared decision-making process. We present 1-year results on pain, function, and quality of life following primary and revision THA.
Patients and methods — From 2010 to 2018, 3,559 primary THA and 406 revision THAs were included in our institutional quality registry. PROMs were registered preoperatively, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery, numeric rating scale (0–10) for pain during mobilization and at rest, healthrelated quality of life (EQ-5D), and a hip-specific physical function score (HOOS-PS). 2 anchor questions were asked 1 year after surgery concerning joint function and willingness to go through surgery again.
Results — There were statistically significant improvements in all PROMs at the 3-month follow-up in both groups. All PROMs improved more in the primary group relative to the revision group. 1 year after surgery, pain during mobilization was reduced with a mean change of 5.1 (SD 2.6) for primary THA and 2.9 (SD 3.0) for revision THA. 93% of primary THA patients reported both better function 1 year after surgery and that they would have gone through surgery again, compared with 78% and 79% in the revision THA group.
Interpretation — Primary THA patients reported better function and more pain relief than the revision THA group 1 year after surgery. Pain during mobilization shows the most marked improvement in both groups, which is important preoperative information for patients. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Patient-reported outcome after primary and aseptic revision hip arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up of 3,559 primary and 406 revision THAs in an institutional registry | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Patient-reported outcome after primary and aseptic revision hip arthroplasty: 1-year follow-up of 3,559 primary and 406 revision THAs in an institutional registry | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 132-137 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 93 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Acta Orthopaedica | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2340/17453674.2021.852 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2104611 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |