Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLerche, Anders Fritz
dc.contributor.authorMathiassen, Svend Erik
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Charlotte Lund
dc.contributor.authorStraker, Leon
dc.contributor.authorSøgaard, Karen
dc.contributor.authorHoltermann, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T07:38:13Z
dc.date.available2023-03-06T07:38:13Z
dc.date.created2022-05-02T13:10:57Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2022, 22 (1), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3055907
dc.description.abstractBackground The Goldilocks Work Principle expresses that productive work should be designed to promote workers’ health. We recently showed that it is feasible to develop and implement modifications to productive work that change physical behaviors (i.e. sitting, standing and being active) in a direction that may promote health among industrial workers. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial investigating health effects of implementing the Goldilocks Work intervention among industrial workers. Methods Our implementation plan consists of educating work teams, organizing implementation meetings, and providing feedback to workers. Three meetings with a preselected local workplace group will be scheduled. The first meeting educates the group to use a planning tool by which work can be planned to have ‘just right’ physical behaviors. The second and third meetings will focus on supporting implementation of the tool in daily work. An expected 28 clusters of work teams across two participating production sites will be randomized to either intervention or control group. Data collection will consist of 1) questionnaires regarding work and musculoskeletal health, 2) wearable sensor measurements of the physical behavior, and 3) assessment of general health indicators, including BMI, blood pressure, and fat percentage. The primary outcome is musculoskeletal health, measured by low back pain intensity, and secondary outcomes are 1) physical behaviors at work, 2) accumulated time in long bouts of sitting, standing, and being active and 3) perceived fatigue and energy during work. Furthermore, implementation and cost of the intervention will be evaluated based on questionnaires and data from the planning tool completed by the workers. Discussion This study will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 12 - weeks Goldilocks Work intervention with the aim of improving musculoskeletal health among industrial workers. The cluster randomized controlled study design and the evaluation of the implementation, results and costs of the intervention will make it capable of contributing with valuable evidence of how productive work may be designed to promote industrial workers’ health.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDesigning industrial work to be ‘just right’ to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work interventionen_US
dc.title.alternativeDesigning industrial work to be ‘just right’ to promote health - a study protocol for a goldilocks work interventionen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Public Healthen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-022-12643-w
dc.identifier.cristin2020656
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal