Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMurad, Abdulmajid
dc.contributor.authorKraemer, Frank Alexander
dc.contributor.authorBach, Kerstin
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Gavin
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T11:35:06Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T11:35:06Z
dc.date.created2021-12-02T20:17:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3053202
dc.description.abstractData-driven forecasts of air quality have recently achieved more accurate short-term predictions. However, despite their success, most of the current data-driven solutions lack proper quantifications of model uncertainty that communicate how much to trust the forecasts. Recently, several practical tools to estimate uncertainty have been developed in probabilistic deep learning. However, there have not been empirical applications and extensive comparisons of these tools in the domain of air quality forecasts. Therefore, this work applies state-of-the-art techniques of uncertainty quantification in a real-world setting of air quality forecasts. Through extensive experiments, we describe training probabilistic models and evaluate their predictive uncertainties based on empirical performance, reliability of confidence estimate, and practical applicability. We also propose improving these models using “free” adversarial training and exploiting temporal and spatial correlation inherent in air quality data. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed models perform better than previous works in quantifying uncertainty in data-driven air quality forecasts. Overall, Bayesian neural networks provide a more reliable uncertainty estimate but can be challenging to implement and scale. Other scalable methods, such as deep ensemble, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout, and stochastic weight averaging-Gaussian (SWAG), can perform well if applied correctly but with different tradeoffs and slight variations in performance metrics. Finally, our results show the practical impact of uncertainty estimation and demonstrate that, indeed, probabilistic models are more suitable for making informed decisions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleProbabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecastingen_US
dc.title.alternativeProbabilistic Deep Learning to Quantify Uncertainty in Air Quality Forecastingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalSensorsen_US
dc.source.issue23en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s21238009
dc.identifier.cristin1963838
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal