Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorImhoff, Roland
dc.contributor.authorZimmer, Felix
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorAntonio, Joao H. C.
dc.contributor.authorBabinska, Maria
dc.contributor.authorBangerter, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorBilewicz, Michal
dc.contributor.authorBlanuša, Nebojsa
dc.contributor.authorBovan, Kosta
dc.contributor.authorBužarovska, Rumena
dc.contributor.authorCichocka, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorDelouvée, Sylvain
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Karen M
dc.contributor.authorDyrendal, Asbjørn
dc.contributor.authorEtienne, Tom
dc.contributor.authorGjoneska, Biljana
dc.contributor.authorGraf, Sylvie
dc.contributor.authorGualda, Estrella
dc.contributor.authorHirschberger, Gilad
dc.contributor.authorKende, Anna
dc.contributor.authorKutiyski, Yordan
dc.contributor.authorKrekó, Peter
dc.contributor.authorKrouwel, André
dc.contributor.authorMari, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorĐorđević, Jasna Milošević
dc.contributor.authorPanasiti, Maria Serena
dc.contributor.authorPantazi, Myrto
dc.contributor.authorPetkovski, Ljupcho
dc.contributor.authorPorciello, Giuseppina
dc.contributor.authorRabelo, André
dc.contributor.authorRadu, Raluca
dc.contributor.authorsava, florin a
dc.contributor.authorSchepisi, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Robbie M
dc.contributor.authorSwami, Viren
dc.contributor.authorThorisdottir, Hulda
dc.contributor.authorTurjacanin, Vladimir
dc.contributor.authorWagner-Egger, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorZezelj, Iris
dc.contributor.authorvan Prooijen, Jan-Willem
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-17T09:02:58Z
dc.date.available2023-02-17T09:02:58Z
dc.date.created2021-11-23T11:49:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationNature Human Behaviour. 2022, 6 392-403.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2397-3374
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3051817
dc.description.abstractPeople differ in their general tendency to endorse conspiracy theories (that is, conspiracy mentality). Previous research yielded inconsistent findings on the relationship between conspiracy mentality and political orientation, showing a greater conspiracy mentality either among the political right (a linear relation) or amongst both the left and right extremes (a curvilinear relation). We revisited this relationship across two studies spanning 26 countries (combined N = 104,253) and found overall evidence for both linear and quadratic relations, albeit small and heterogeneous across countries. We also observed stronger support for conspiracy mentality among voters of opposition parties (that is, those deprived of political control). Nonetheless, the quadratic effect of political orientation remained significant when adjusting for political control deprivation. We conclude that conspiracy mentality is associated with extreme left- and especially extreme right-wing beliefs, and that this non-linear relation may be strengthened by, but is not reducible to, deprivation of political control.en_US
dc.description.abstractConspiracy Mentality and Political Orientation across 26 countriesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNatureen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01258-7
dc.subjectKonspirasjonsmentaliteten_US
dc.subjectConspiracy mentalityen_US
dc.titleConspiracy Mentality and Political Orientation across 26 countriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeConspiracy Mentality and Political Orientation across 26 countriesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social sciences: 200en_US
dc.source.pagenumber392-403en_US
dc.source.volume6en_US
dc.source.journalNature Human Behaviouren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
dc.identifier.cristin1957705
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record