Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Guro Falk
dc.contributor.authorSaltyte Benth, Jurate
dc.contributor.authorGrønberg, Bjørn Henning
dc.contributor.authorRostoft, Siri
dc.contributor.authorKirkhus, Lene
dc.contributor.authorKirkevold, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorOldervoll, Line Merethe
dc.contributor.authorBye, Asta
dc.contributor.authorHjelstuen, Anne Kristine
dc.contributor.authorJordhøy, Marit Slaaen
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-27T06:48:51Z
dc.date.available2023-01-27T06:48:51Z
dc.date.created2022-10-07T11:52:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1879-4068
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3046705
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Quality of life (QoL) and function are important outcomes for older adults with cancer. We aimed to assess differences in trends in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during radiotherapy (RT) between (1) groups with curative or palliative treatment intent and (2) groups defined according to the number of geriatric impairments. Materials and methods: A prospective observational study including patients aged ≥65 years receiving curative or palliative RT was conducted. Geriatric assessment (GA) was performed before RT, and cut-offs for impairments within each domain were defined. Patients were grouped according to the number of geriatric impairments: 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4. Our primary outcomes, global QoL and physical function (PF), were assessed by The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC) (QLQ-C30) at baseline, RT completion, and two, eight, and sixteen weeks later. Differences in trends in outcomes between the groups were assessed by linear mixed models. Results: 301 patients were enrolled, mean age was 73.6 years, 53.8% received curative RT. Patients receiving palliative RT reported significantly worse global QoL and PF compared to the curative group. The prevalence of 0, 1, 2, 3 and ≥ 4 geriatric impairments was 16.6%, 22.7%, 16.9%, 16.3% and 27.5%, respectively. Global QoL and PF gradually decreased with an increasing number of impairments. These group differences remained stable from baseline throughout follow-up without any clinically significant changes for any of the outcomes. Discussion: Increasing number of geriatric impairments had a profound negative impact on global QoL and PF, but no further decline was observed for any group or outcome, indicating that RT was mainly well tolerated. Thus, geriatric impairments per se should not be reasons for withholding RT. GA is key to identifying vulnerable patients in need of supportive measures, which may have the potential to improve treatment tolerance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://www.clinicalkey.com/service/content/pdf/watermarked/1-s2.0-S1879406822002272.pdf
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleGeriatric impairments are associated with reduced quality of life and physical function in older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy - A prospective observational studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeGeriatric impairments are associated with reduced quality of life and physical function in older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy - A prospective observational studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Geriatric Oncologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jgo.2022.09.008
dc.identifier.cristin2059532
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal